top of page

The Complication That Was Yours...

Writer: Aden Davis
Aden Davis
Aug 31
4 min read

Updated: Sep 11

Cut to the Chase: General Surgery Survival Series — Post 28


The list has eleven names on it. You can only see one.


You pre-round the way you always do. Labs, vitals, outputs. Somewhere in the middle you stand at the foot of a bed and say good morning to someone still here because of something you decided.


Then rounds start at six, on all eleven, and nothing acknowledges it.


Post 27 cost you two and a half hours. This is the day it costs more than time.


Two surgical interns in a hospital hallway review a Patient List on a monitor, one is asking the other to see a patient from their patient list.

What runs now is a private trial, held between tasks, with you as prosecution, defense, and the only witness who was in the room. You will read Tuesday's operative note back. Not for the chart. For the sentence that convicts you.


Everyone does this. Some of us still do it about a case from fifteen years ago.


Before any of that, write down what happened while you still remember the order. Not a note in the chart. A page for yourself: when you saw her, what you found, what you did, who you told and at what hour.


You will need it in a week and you will not have it, because by then the story has smoothed itself out. The version you assemble at two in the morning from memory is worse than the one you write on Tuesday, and you will believe it longer.


Here is the problem with that trial. You know the ending, and you are entering it as evidence. By noon the leak is obvious. Yesterday afternoon there was a soft abdomen, a heart rate of 88, and a drain nobody looked at twice. Different clinical moments. The verdict collapses them.


Go through it in the order the information actually arrived, starting the day before anybody was worried. Work backward from the scan and you will end up blaming yourself for something nobody could see at the time.

Do that honestly and what comes back is rarely a number.


Stop trying to work out what percentage of this was you. Nobody finishes that one. Ask when it was still fixable instead, and go look at what you did at that hour.

That is the part of the word nobody explains. Ownership is not a share of blame. It is a position on the timeline. You were standing there and you have the details, which makes you the only one who can describe it accurately. A job. Not a sentence.


The other thing that happens is quieter. You stop walking into the room.


You let the other intern round on them. You take the other half of the list. You tell yourself you are staying out of the way, and a busy service is very willing to help you believe it.


Walking in is easier if you know the first sentence, so decide it before you reach the door. You are there to examine her and tell her what the plan is today, the same as any other patient on the list.


She does not need you to raise it that morning. That conversation happens with the attending, and it happens once. What she notices is who keeps showing up afterward.


Meanwhile that patient needs somebody in the building who knows exactly what happened on Tuesday, and for the next several days that is you.


A complication rarely changes how a team reads you. Rounding on that room last, or not at all, does it in about three days.

I clipped a common bile duct. Lap chole, a Wednesday, a secretary in the nursing school. I want to be precise. I was not rushing and I was not guessing.


The structure looked exactly like what I wanted it to be, and it went on looking that way in the still photo I put up eight days later. That is the part worth your attention. She got a hepaticojejunostomy. She recovered. I still know the date.


Female surgical resident is presenting at M&M conference.  She is standing in front of an intraoperative cholangiogram

Some of this ends up at M&M, which trainees walk into expecting a tribunal. It isn't one. The purpose is narrow. Make the mistake once, in one patient, then make it unavailable to everyone else in the room.


What I listen for is whether you can describe the decision using only what you knew at the moment you made it. People arrive having quietly rewritten themselves as the genius who was overruled or the idiot who missed the obvious. Neither version teaches anybody anything.


Hindsight wrecks more presentations than ignorance does. Bring the decision with the information you had when you had it, and a room full of surgeons can work with that. A confession gives it nothing to work with.

Watch what it does four months later. One leak and you are drawing lactates on people walking laps in the hall. At a distance it reads as diligence. Up close it is an old case making your decisions, and another patient pays for it.


Rounds start at six tomorrow too. Eleven names, and one of them you will see first.


Every careful surgeon I know keeps a short list of patients they think about. That list is where they got careful.



What to Read Next: Post 29, “Telling a Family Something They Did Not See Coming.” Everything above happens between clinicians. The harder version happens in a hallway, with people who trusted you and had no idea this was on the table.

Comments


bottom of page