Stop Giving Data Dumps

Cut to the Chase: General Surgery Survival Series — Post 06

We’re at the scrub sink. Case starts in four minutes. I look over and ask how Mr. Johnson is doing this morning.

That question sounds casual, and it’s the only chance I get to find out whether I should be worried before I’m committed to a case for the next four hours.

You take a breath and start. Sixty-eight-year-old male, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, GERD, appendectomy in 1987, overnight 118 to 146 systolic, heart rate 82 to 109, sodium 138, potassium 4.1, chloride 103…

I’m still scrubbing.

I haven’t stopped you because I stopped caring. I’m searching. Somewhere in there is the answer to three things: is he okay, did anything change overnight, and is there anything I need before I walk in. It’s in there. I just haven’t found it.

Tell me what changed overnight before you tell me anything else. If nothing changed, say that, and you’ve answered most of what I was going to ask next.

I stood at this same sink as a third-year, presenting to an attending who said nothing at all while I talked. I had no idea what he wanted, so I gave him everything I had and hoped something in it would land.

He waited until I ran out. Then he asked whether the patient had passed gas, which was the only thing he’d wanted, and I hadn’t checked. I still open presentations by answering the question I think is coming, and I’m still not always right about which one it is.

So the instinct to give more isn’t wrong, and I’d rather have too much than lose something that mattered. If you’re not sure whether a detail belongs, include it and flag it. “I wasn’t sure if this was significant, but his urine output dropped to 15 an hour around four.” That sentence is exactly right.

What we’re asking you to do is sort. Not censor.

Start with a one-liner. Name, where they are in the course, and the single issue on the table today. “Mr. Johnson is POD2 from his colectomy, overall stable, but still no bowel function and his pain has been tough to control.” Everything after that answers one question: what do we do about it?

Then the vitals that support the headline. If his pressure and his sat are fine, say so in four words. If something is trending wrong, tell us by how much and in which direction.

“He was tachycardic overnight, peaked at 112, came down with fluids” is useful. “Heart rate was 88, then 92, then 97, then 104, then 112, then 98 after 500 of LR” is the same information, and now we have to assemble it ourselves.

Read the flowsheet before rounds and decide what it says. Reading it out loud to us is not the same as having read it.

Labs work the same way. Lead with what changed. If the white count was 14 yesterday and it’s 18 today, say that first. Nobody has ever saved rounds by announcing a normal chloride with confidence.

What counts as relevant moves with the question in front of us. If the issue is return of bowel function, we want distention, nausea, NG output, gas, and the exam. If it’s possible sepsis, we want the fever curve, the urine output, the lactate, and where it might be coming from. Same patient, different half of the chart.

Here’s what it sounds like. Same patient, same information.

The dump: “So this is a 24-year-old female with a PMH of asthma and anxiety who presented with right lower quadrant pain and leukocytosis, CT showed acute appendicitis, she went to the OR yesterday for laparoscopic appendectomy, intra-op there was an inflamed non-perforated appendix, now POD1, overnight vitals were 98.7, 120/70, heart rate ranged from 88 to 102, sats 97 to 100 on room air, urine output was…”

By the third line we’ve lost the story, because we can’t tell where it’s going.

The same patient done right: “Ms. Jones is a 24-year-old, POD1 from laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis. No overnight events. Pain controlled on PO meds, tolerating diet, ambulating, afebrile, white count down from 14 to 10. I think she’s ready to go home later today.”

One version makes us search. The other tells us where to look.

Then don’t disappear at the end. A presentation without an assessment is organized transcription. One sentence is enough.

“I think he’s recovering appropriately and the main issue is pain limiting ambulation.” Or “I’m worried her tachycardia is out of proportion and we may be missing something.” Or “I’m not sure yet, and I wanted your read before rounds.”

That last one counts. Say what you think even when you’re wrong, because wrong and thoughtful is something I can teach at the table.

Close the chart and say what you think out loud, once, before you present it. If you can’t do it without the notebook, you know the chart and not the patient.

And if we ask for more after a tight presentation, that isn’t a failure. That’s rounds, and it usually means we’re engaged.

Some morning in a few weeks you’ll give the one-liner, stop, and nobody will ask you anything. You’ll stand there for a second wondering whether you left something out. Then the list moves on, because there are eleven more and the first case is at seven-thirty.

---

What to Read Next: Post 07, “My First Laparoscopic Case.” You’ve just been asked to talk clearly under pressure. Next you get handed the camera, and everything you say is about something the whole room can see.